I’m assuming it’s British because there is no country name on the stamp. I do not collect British stamps and don’t have access to a proper catalogue for Great Britain. Any information would be helpful. Sorry the image is upside down. I have no idea how to right it. I’m off to search for more photo upload information for the site.
Silence in the face of adversity is the father of complicity and collusion, the first cousins of conspiracy.. 10 Dec 2020 04:39:17am
re: Can someone help ID this coil pair?
Should not the top and bottom edges have been cut sharply,
rather than having been torn ?
Perhaps someone with younger eyes check that out. Otherwise
how would you know the pair is from a coil and not a sheet
or booklet ?
  1 Member likes this post. Login to Like.
".... You may think you understood what you thought I said, but I'm not sure you realize that what you think you heard is not what I thought I meant. .... "
Great Britain
Stanley Gibbons Concise lists the 1 1/2d value as either #362 if watermark 100 or #420 if watermark 111.
There is the possibility of varieties in the watermarks -- sideways or inverted, etc.; often those are on ex-booklet pane examples.
This pair to my eyes appears to be torn on all sides and is most likely ex-sheet rather than ex-booklet pane.
To the best of my knowledge, the G. B. Concise catalogue does not mention any coils; I do not have the specialist catalogue for King George V.
I cannot comment on the cancel.
Catalogue value in SG Concise 2019 for a basic used single example is one pound for the #420 and one pound fifty pence for the #362.
J. T. Hurd.
Login to Like this post
Please Note: Postings that were loaded from the old Discussion Board cannot be edited.